The city of gulf shores is committed to investing in capital projects that maintain and improve the quality of life in our city while also meeting the needs and desires of its citizens.From the best seafood spots and bike trails to beach gear rentals, everything you need to plan your next trip to gulf shores and orange.
Mon, apr 8, 2024 at 1:54 pm 0.810 magnitude:Watch the sky light up over the gulf of mexico at gulf shore's independence day celebration on july 4 with a stunning firework display at gulf state park fishing and.These free concerts begin at 5:30 p.m.
Branyon backcountry trail, which has recently been extended and now winds more than 27 miles through orange beach to the pristine sands of gulf.At this time, the moon will begin covering the face of the sun.
The water is also warm, making it perfect for swimming, sunbathing.The us average is 205 sunny days.The best small towns in the gulf coast to chill out in 2024.
On average, there are 213 sunny days per year in birmingham.gulf shores averages 223 sunny days per year.Relax on the pristine beaches.
For information about other fishing seasons and regulations, click on this link.Our 2024 mardi gras parade will take place on tuesday, february 13 at 10 a.m.Mon, apr 8, 2024 at 12:34 pm:
Streets, traffic, landmarks and transport of gulf shores, al.Usa / alabama / gulf shores gulf shores, alabama is a wonderful coastal city situated in baldwin county, along the gulf of mexico, approximately 50 miles southwest of pensacola, florida.
Key times for gulf coast.This beautiful coastal town has it all, from.
Last update images today Gulf Shores Map Alabama
Higham-Claridge Stand Keeps Storm Rooted To Foot Of Table
We're analysing every VAR decision made throughout all 51 games at Euro 2024. On Wednesday, England were awarded a penalty against Netherlands for a challenge by Denzel Dumfries on Harry Kane. Why was it given, and was it the correct decision?
After each game, we take a look at the major incidents to examine and explain the process in terms of VAR protocol and the laws of the game.
Netherlands 1-2 England Possible penalty: Dumfries challenge on KaneWhat happened: England were on the attack in the 14th minute with Harry Kane attempting a shot from a bouncing ball that was hit over the bar. He was caught by Netherlands defender Denzel Dumfries after releasing the shot, and went down in pain. Referee Felix Zwayer pointed for a goal kick, but after a few moments it became clear the VAR was checking for a possible penalty.
VAR decision: Penalty, scored by Kane.
VAR review: There's an unwritten law in football that if a player manages to complete a shot on goal and is then caught by a defending player, there shouldn't be a penalty. So why is that? Mainly it's because the attacking team cannot lose out on anything because of the challenge -- the shot has been released and the move is over.
It's seems odd, because often in this situation we'd say "but that's a foul anywhere else on the pitch." But make no mistake, there's another unwritten law that the threshold is far higher on a penalty providing a shot on goal vs. a free kick in an area that isn't immediately dangerous.
So, how did England get a penalty in this situation?
It's a very harsh intervention by the VAR, Bastian Dankert. It's his ninth game of the tournament, far more than any other video assistant. He has clearly earned a reputation within UEFA as its most trusted VAR throughout the tournament.
So, why has Dankert advised a penalty? He has taken the nature of Dumfries' challenge, leading with the studs as opposed to making an attempt to kick through the ball, as being reckless -- which is why the Netherlands' player was booked. And that's the one area where a defender catching an attacker after a shot can be seeing as a penalty -- when it's reckless or dangerous.
Can you see why this might be a penalty? Yes. Does this reach UEFA's high threshold for a clear and obvious error for a VAR intervention? No. You can only think Kane's reaction, going down in pain, persuaded the VAR.
And in UEFA competition you will almost never see a VAR intervention rejected at the monitor by the referee.
